Aave devs look set to receive $16.3M via retroactive funding | Crypto Fight
Aave devs look set to receive $16.3M via retroactive funding.
A proposal to reward members of the Aave Companies with $16.28 million in retroactive funding for the development of v3 of the Aave Protocol looks set to pass.
The decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) behind the decentralized finance (DeFi) platform Aave has accepted a proposal to reward members from Aave Companies with $16.28 million in retroactive funding for their role in the development of Aave Protocol v3.
Voting for the proposal began on Tuesday and, at the time of writing, has already passed 667,000 votes in favor of the funding, more than doubling the 320,000 required. The vote is set to end on Sept. 8.
According to the initial proposal, which was first pitched on Aug. 10, the Aave Request for Comment (ARC) sought “retroactive funding” for work in developing the v3 protocol.
The $16.28 million consists of $15 million for work performed by the developers over the course of more than one year and $1.28 million for costs paid to third-party auditors. The money will be given to members of the firm behind the popular DeFi protocol, Aave Companies.
The funding will be made up of a combination of AAVE tokens, Dai (DAI), Tether (USDT), USD Coin (USDC), alternative stable assets such as Frax stablecoin and higher volatility assets like Synthetix following the passing of the proposal.
While the origins of the retroactive public goods funding model are unclear, it was popularized following a collaborative post on Medium between Vitalik Buterin and Ethereum scaling solution firm Optimism on July 21, 2021.
The post argued that the “retroactive public goods funding” model provides an incentive for developers to work on projects by allowing them to get paid after the project is completed and can be based on the value it provides.
The core principle behind the concept is that “it’s easier to agree on what was useful than what will be useful.”
Vitalik suggests in the post that it can be difficult in the beginning phase of a project to get it off the ground, with donations and grant money being insufficient to incentivize developers.
