Not rushing ,obviously. But BTC price went to my lowest & main | Crypto Bravehearts

Not rushing ,obviously. But BTC price went to my lowest & main liquidity level I was watching (& shared here previously)

Big profits for our short positions But what next ?

First of all - not rushing. 2nd - if longing ,(even if only for scalping) but ONLY if gaining again momentum . Will be that easy? I don’t think so ,as it’s below 28.7k-30k ,we’re in the danger zone (ONLY after flipping again 30/31k into support - means closing above on the daily/weekly ,then retesting on lower timeframes & bouncing strongly with volume - then I’ll be again confident & feeling safer on most of my long positions)
Means I’m not longing anymore ? NO ,scalps will be always on my plays ,but talking macro especially.
Wednesday FOMC meeting - very important to consider if more blood (or not ,but needing Jesus to help here ,a really big fakeout below 30k & then reclaiming strongly- that would mean ,if & when will do)
So if you see the ltf chart on btc ,25338 is my KEY level right now. For now did what I’ve expected ,fakeout below ,bounce above + retest on ltf & bounce again . That would mean longs at that point on ltf (for btc but also on some altcoins) ,but very very very cautiously,as my only defending point is that level. Meaning entering a long on here above 25338 (in btc & some alts ) especially for scalps ,I’d do with all my SL right below / if losing it ,so very very tight . We need very low/ approx 0 risk in such situations. Not catching knives without a strategy ,and that’s my plan . Trying to anticipate a crazy reversal ? Would be really crazy as now bears are on total control ,but also I’m managing at this 25338 my longs , only IF this will hold as support. If lost ,DEFINITELY NOT INTERESTED.
So ,if you’re not a experienced trader ,then play the swings ,if you want a SAFER swing scenario ,then ONLY AFTER RECLAIMING 30k-31k into support . If you are more experienced and you’re playing scalps ,then consider what I’ve said above (&trade based on that)