Get Mystery Box with random crypto!

TRUSTWALLET SUPPORT ❇️

Logo of telegram channel trustwalleteu — TRUSTWALLET SUPPORT ❇️ T
Topics from channel:
Zilliqans
Zilofirerocket
Zilliqa
Fintech
Дефи
Esports
All tags
Logo of telegram channel trustwalleteu — TRUSTWALLET SUPPORT ❇️
Topics from channel:
Zilliqans
Zilofirerocket
Zilliqa
Fintech
Дефи
Esports
All tags
Channel address: @trustwalleteu
Categories: Cryptocurrencies
Language: English
Subscribers: 14.25K

Ratings & Reviews

4.50

0 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

0

4 stars

0

3 stars

0

2 stars

0

1 stars

0


The latest Messages

2022-10-11 06:37:26
Hello! Are you having any problems with TRUSTWALLET??

Contact our official admin below

@Larry_Supports
@Anita_Support
52.1K viewsedited  03:37
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:46
What is TrustWallet?
Trust Wallet is a mobile wallet app that lets you send, receive and store cryptocurrency tokens, including IoTeX. Designed with a focus on simplicity, Trustwallet aims to provide a platform that’s easy and straightforward to set up and use. TrustWallet was aquired by BINANCE  in July 2018.
304.3K viewsedited  02:55
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:44
With Mainnet Alpha on the horizon, IoTeX is always looking for new convenient ways for our community to stake/vote for Delegates. Flexibility, clean interface, and security are needed to ensure the safety of voters’ tokens and provide a great user experience. This is why we are excited to announce the new IoTeX
299.8K viewsedited  02:55
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:44
BREAKING NEWS: Blockchain Visionary Dr. Ben Livshits Appointed Zilliqa’s new CEO

This is a thrilling time for Zilliqa as we welcome industry leader Dr. Ben Livshits as our new CEO.

A true blockchain visionary, Ben understands how to make blockchain work for people. As background: Ben comes to us from Brave. His contribution there was a massive success; he led high-growth teams to commercialise Brave Browser, which today attracts nearly 40M users and 1M content creators.

He will be instrumental in making Zilliqa a global name and accelerating user adoption as we dive into #DeFi, the creator economy and make strategic investments in groundbreaking projects across #fintech, gaming, #esports, art & more.

We at the Zilliqa team look forward to working with you Ben. Together, let's make Zilliqa as powerful, usable, and value-driven as possible!
301.3K viewsedited  02:55
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:39
Trust Wallet supports several blockchains where tokens are being issued. Some examples are ERC20 on the Ethereum Network, BEP20 on Binance Smart Chain, and SPL tokens on the Solana blockchain.
The following steps are only applicable if the token sent is on a blockchain that is supported by the app. The transaction should also be confirmed on the blockchain explorer. No confirmed transaction, no token received on your wallet. You can refer to this guide for further information
297.7K viewsedited  02:55
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:38
When a token has been successfully sent to the wallet and it does not appear, it can be manually added as a Custom Token. For this guide, we will try to add a BEP20 token that is on the Binance Smart Chain.
Step 1. Search for the Token
Tap on the toggle sign in the upper right corner of the main Wallet screen. Search for the token, and if the token is not available, you will see a “No Asset Found” message with an Add Custom Token button.
299.8K viewsedited  02:55
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:37
Great news. $gZIL and $ZWAP are now listed on Liquid! With USDT and BTC trading pairs for these tokens and ZIL, Liquid is a centralised exchange hub for ZRC-2 tokens, making it easy for users to on ramp from fiat to a pool of different ZRC2 tokens! From 17 Sep to 1 Oct, enjoy trading these tokens with NO trading fees.
294.4K views02:55
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:36 Post-mortem Report for Mainnet Upgrade v8.1.0



Background: The Zilliqa protocol underwent a mainnet upgrade on Aug 30, 2021. This upgrade introduced important features to enable ZilBridge such as:

- Merkle Patricia tree data structure for contract storage
- Contract proof API needed for PolyNet relayers

It also included several stability, maintenance and bug fixes such as:

- Several memory clean up improvements
- Improve network stability for JSON RPC API service
- Improve PoW submission handling
- Node syncing improvement

The upgrade took a few hours and once the upgrade was completed, miners had started to join the network and started processing transactions, some exchanges like Binance had also opened up deposit and withdrawals.

Issue reported: At this point, one of the community devs from the Duck team reached out with an observation with their NFT token minting contract. They noticed that there were two transactions, one with TXID starting with 0xef and another starting with 0x02 which had minted the same token_id 1351. The first transaction was done before the upgrade had started, while the second one after the upgrade.

For some reasons, the transaction and therefore the state change that happened before the upgrade was ignored and the network after the upgrade wasn’t aware that the token_id 1351 had already been sold and hence after the upgrade, it was resold to a new buyer.

Early investigation and first action taken: As soon as we were informed about this, we started to look into the code of the Duck NFT minting contract. The contract code looked correct. After investigating a bit more, we suspected that the mainnet post-upgrade had started with a wrong global state and as a result the transaction before the upgrade even though it did happen, was considered to be non-existent from the network’s perspective. Since the global state that the nodes started with post-upgrade was somehow corrupted, we suspected the impact to be beyond the Duck NFT contract.

This took us a few hours and by that time 4,478 transactions had been processed by the network post-upgrade. Many of these transactions had been processed with the corrupt initial global state. In order to reduce the impact of the corrupted global state, we decided to disable RPC endpoints that allow users to send transactions. By doing so, we limited any future transaction to be processed under a wrong global state.

Investigating the root cause: After making sure that we had restricted the impact by disabling transactions, we started to investigate a bit deeper into what had gone wrong. We found that when the network was upgraded to v8.1.0 at block number 1,394,088, the final global state after the upgrade was not the same as the global state before the upgrade had started. In other words, the global state after block 1,394,088 was not the same as the state before block 1,394,089.

The main reason behind this was that the state changes for the last 88 blocks (i.e., for all the blocks processed in the last epoch, each epoch is characterised by 100 blocks) were not fully taken into account for the global state post-upgrade. The state changes for these 88 blocks are stored in what’s called a state delta as these 88 blocks had not formed a full 100-blocks epoch. Consider state delta as a temporary change in the global state to be effectuated at the end of the epoch. Nodes keep these state deltas separately until the epoch is fully complete. At the end of the epoch (i.e., every 100 blocks), the state delta is then merged with the global state.

To summarize, the issue was that while all the merged state deltas were considered part of the global state (i.e., all transactions until block 1,394,000), transactions made in the last 88 blocks such as the DUCK NFT minting transaction were ignored. As a result, even though those transactions were processed by the network, the state after the upgrade did not consider the state change that they created. It was as if those transactions never occurred.
295.1K views02:55
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:36 To execute on this thesis, the community and the core team have to come together. Execution will be in phases that could very well overlap. In fact, we can already see some of the implementation within the ecosystem, some started by the core team and more by the dev community.

Let me elaborate a bit on how I see these phases come together:

Phase 1 (aka Build the Basics Phase): In this phase, we focus on building the basic tools to make sure that the ecosystem and the community has the needed infrastructure, tools and other resources available.

I firmly believe that the success of the rest of the initiatives will heavily depend on the UI and UX of the tools and infra we build in this phase. There are a few key infrastructures that will be must:

NFT marketplaces
NFT wallets
Contract standards
Indexing tools

Let's take NFT marketplaces for example. An ideal NFT marketplace must support:

Easy access to NFT wallets
Easy exploration of NFTs in all wallets
Blind and public auctions
Limited edition NFT drops
Bonding curve NFT distribution
Payment in Fiat and Crypto
Royalty fees for secondary NFT sales
Allow businesses to create a whitelabeled solution if needed with similar backend/smart contracts. This will be handy to build curated marketplaces that are less open.

On a similar note, an ideal NFT wallet must have the following characteristics:

Mobile first
Magic, Zeeves, ZILPay and Moonlet login integrations
Ability to view and manage NFTs easily
Connect the wallet with the NFT marketplace

Phase 2 (aka Growth Hacking Phase): In this phase, we ought to focus on building a community that supports the idea of NFTs and fan tokens. Without a supporting community that has a critical size, it is impossible to go any further. As any further building will not see traction.

he idea will be to build a community of collectors, fans, curators, artists and enthusiasts from all walks of lives. But, we won't be able to build a community without the right products and growth incentives to drive the demand for those products within that community.

To this end, the core team and the community should come together and take initiatives like:

Build products to drive NFT volume on marketplaces.
Set up a Creator’s Fund run as a DAO, the ownership of which can be tokenised and be tradable on ZILSwap.
Create incentives for people to engage with NFTs and social tokens.
Create a market for NFT creators which encourages creators to create more assets knowing that there will be a market for their assets.

Phase 3 (aka Advanced Building): This is the phase to go crazy. For example:

New NFT application directions
Decentralised Patreon for everything
Decentralised social media
Use DeFi to solve NFT liquidity
Collectible games

We're seeing great work in all phases. Marketplaces like Mintable, Okimoto. Wallets like Sparda. NFT products like Elons, DeMons, ZilDuck , ZILStarts, and social tokens like UFF Sports, Xcademy Official. And a lot many are also being supported by ZILHive.

Let's keep building and bring more users to each of these products and to those which will come in the near future.

Cheers!

Amrit Kumar
299.5K views02:55
Open / Comment
2022-01-04 05:55:35
Sunday Read from Amrit Kumar

NFT and social token thesis for the $ZIL ecosystem: Celebrities and influencers carry as much value as any goods, product or services. In the blockchain world, it has started to give rise to the rebirth of NFTs which has naturally extended to social and fan tokens.

We are witnessing the early signs of a decentralised creator economy which enables influencers, artists and in fact anyone to monetise themselves. Their ‘virtual’ value becoming tradable on a “humanised stock market” that enables trading of ownership or belonging to a community.

Creators in this economy get adequately recognised and rewarded for their skills, authenticity, ability to engage a large fan base and general know-how by having a direct access to their fans. Fans on the other hand can extract value for their contribution to creators' success.
293.0K views02:55
Open / Comment