🔥 Burn Fat Fast. Discover How! 💪

Libre Blockchain

Logo of telegram channel librehash — Libre Blockchain L
Logo of telegram channel librehash — Libre Blockchain
Channel address: @librehash
Categories: Cryptocurrencies
Language: English
Subscribers: 3.63K
Description from channel

Blockchain Libre
librehash.org
twitter.com/librehash
@librecharts
@librechain
@libredarkweb
@librecryptography
@libresec
@librehashdiscussion
No Affiliations

Ratings & Reviews

4.33

3 reviews

Reviews can be left only by registered users. All reviews are moderated by admins.

5 stars

2

4 stars

0

3 stars

1

2 stars

0

1 stars

0


The latest Messages 13

2021-06-12 10:30:08 Unpacking What We Just Read Above

The terms that MS was able to get for this convertible debt were actually very favorable for the business.

To wit, they were able to raise the entire $1.05B without an interest requirement. On top of that they got investors to pay at a >50% premium (which means that the convertible notes were sold at a rate that's 50% above what the spot price was [roughly] at the time the deal was finalized).

Deciphering the Gibberish

Okay, that's a lot of financial talk - so let's try to break this down for a second.

These notes that investors receive are convertible for a fixed # of shares of MicroStrategy.

Specifically, the rate is 0.6981 shares per $1k worth of notes.

So if you bought $5k worth of notes, then you could exchange those notes for 3.49 shares of MicroStrategy ([5000/1000]*0.6981=3.49).

At $955 (par price for MS at the time of purchase), this is a loss for investors - but there are a few caveats associated with these convertible notes that actually make this a unique investment option for traders that are comfortable sacrificing upside for the sake of limiting their exposure (risk) for a certain asset.
155 views07:30
Open / Comment
2021-05-26 07:17:15 Fluffypony from Monero Cannot be Trusted at All The author of this channel fully expects that many will believe that this channel is fabricating this claim with some sort of ulterior motive (i.e., more followers / attention / "clout" / settle a vendetta,…
482 views04:17
Open / Comment
2021-05-26 07:17:09 Blockstream Admitted to Leaving a Vulnerability Open on "Liquid" for Some Time This is in plain English, authored by Adam Back himself and published on the Blockstream Medium: https://medium.com/blockstream/patching-the-liquid-timelock-issue-b4b2f5f9a973…
243 views04:17
Open / Comment
2021-05-25 11:48:31 Blockstream Admitted to Leaving a Vulnerability Open on "Liquid" for Some Time

This is in plain English, authored by Adam Back himself and published on the Blockstream Medium: https://medium.com/blockstream/patching-the-liquid-timelock-issue-b4b2f5f9a973

The post admits what James Prestwich (actual Bitcoin developer and contributor & former Blockstream employee) said was correct. If you're curious about the claims that he made, you can find them here: https://twitter.com/_prestwich/status/1277090512126660608?s=20

Bitcoin is compromised as long as Blockstream is in the position to make unilateral decisions about what happens on the protocol.
450 views08:48
Open / Comment
2021-05-25 05:58:45
Blockstream announced on their own website that they had successfully underwent a $55 million funding round.

Just thought this should be posted for the folks that keep running around claiming that the information published about Blockstream is a "conspiracy theory" (you really have to be dense as fuck to believe something that stupid)

source: https://archive.is/psaEH

They also state:

"We are renowned architects of Bitcoin, cryptographers, cypherpunks, entrepreneurs, as well as leadewrs from the business, policy, and the open source community." (none of that is true)
510 views02:58
Open / Comment
2021-05-24 03:58:58 Solutions Bitcoin Could Implement Right Now to Get Everyone Rich and Solve Mad Problems

1. Move the decimal two places to the right. So if you have 1 bitcoin, it shows up as 100 ; or if you have 0.003, it would be 0.3 /// One of the biggest issue for Bitcoin's price (in the real world & for fees) is rooted in its denomination. This would also make the currency psychologically feel a lot more flexible than it is (i.e., having to plop down $30k+ just to have one BTC).

2. Increase the block size - obviously. Everyone should be in unanimous agreement with this. 1MB block size in 2021 is outrageously fucking unacceptable. A 10-year old raspberry pi running Ubuntu 14 with a RISC-V chip should be able to handle an increase at this point.

3. Decrease the block times and also cut down the difficulty retargeting time by 50% (to start, with a gradual goal of getting down to a minute within the next couple of years)

4. Publish a concrete, public roadmap for swapping out the cryptographic primitives that Bitcoin uses. Quantum computers are really on the horizon and must be addressed sooner or later. Its not a math & it isn't a theory. They exist now and are already capable of crunching computations in a manner that confers an advantage to them vs. modern computing's ability

5. Abandon the idea of a Genesis Block and start checkpointing the chain. When there was a value overflow incident back in 2010 , Satoshi and others were able to coordinate w a plan to omit the erroneous TX by forking to another block. But that's the story we've been told. Who knows, maybe that never happened and they said they did (being devil's advocate; we know that it happened). Main point being that there is a philosophical constraint to the proven legitimacy of the data - even if you do keep the entire dating back to Genesis. Whether the network is compromised or not is always going to be a subjective assessment by those that interact with it (more ideas attached to this; but the basic concept should be entertained)

6. Begin exploring ideas that would allow the Bitcoin network (nodes) to be leveraged to relay something else other than transactions (and perhaps even be paid in Bitcoin for it). They were able to figure something out very similar to this for Stratum - no reason why it can't happen for Bitcoin too.

Those behind 'Bitcoin Core' / 'Blockstream' etc., are fucking up this space and people are letting them because they allow themselves to get pimped by the media in blockchain to support / oppose certain ideas that never obtained the consensus of the community.

Need proof? If you dig into Core's conversations, you can see that they've always felt like taproot would be a guarantee.

Don't be part of the first generation of "blockchain adopters", that never really got introduced to blockchain on any substantive level yet assumed that they did and ended up going broke trying to get rich quick.
628 views00:58
Open / Comment
2021-05-24 03:40:48 Bitcoin Core Refusing to Touch Memory at all Costs is Fucking Weird

There is no scaling debate to be honest. There are just things that need to be done in order to make Bitcoin usable.

1MB as a block size is unacceptable. 10 minute block times are unacceptable. The difficulty algorithm is unacceptable. Having two different "classes" of transactions (where some include signatures to be processed & validated, while the others don't) is really dumb. It adds a ton of unnecessary technical debt to the protocol.

Lightning Network is Bullshit

No, this channel didn't "hear" anything from anyone. I just schooled a couple of Core developers on their own mailing list about how Bitcoin works (because Chow's reply indicates that he has no clue).

Ligtning Network makes zero sense. It doesn't actually work out on paper. And no body uses it or wants it. Full stop.

Bitcoin Will Die if People Don't Realize This

Bitcoin sucks right now. Waiting an hour to receive a transaction, paying $20-60 fees at that, being forced to maneuver within an ecosystem that's damn near as closed-ended as banks are.

The technology is extremely legitimate. But there are people using that fact to sit on their hands and do nothing because they have financial interests at stake.
517 views00:40
Open / Comment
2021-05-24 03:31:41 Librehash Response to Bitcoin Core

First, let them know that 'Mastering Bitcoin' was only given as an example. But from that point forward, just dug into the actual code of Bitcoin:

1. txorphange file ihttps://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/7fcf53f7b4524572d1d0c9a5fdc388e87eb02416/src/txorphanage.cpp

2. orphan_work_set = https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/blob/master/src/net_processing.cpp

^^ LIterally says in the code notes, "Reconsider orphan transactions after a parent has been accepted to the mempool"

Not sure what 'MaybePunishNodeForTx' is supposed to mean (how would a node be "punished" - and what proof would there be that a node should be punished in this situation?)

This entire discussion and train of thought is a fucking mess here: https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/pull/18044

Not sure why anyone wants to dick around fighting for a few additional bytes on the protocol (originally designed for 32-bit machines), when there are tons of lightweight signing algorithms out there (not to mention XOFs like Shake or Blake3 that are keyed hashes [serving as a commitment / encoder for more complex cryptographic schemes]).

Core is ass backward in a lot of ways. Its clear btw from the PRs, conversations in IRCs and various conversations on successful pulls on Git (or approved ones), that these people are in some sort of identified, membership-required team of coders / programmers / etc., that are essentially doing a fucking job of some sort.

The job part is mentioned because there's no rhyme or reason as to why they incessantly pursue some development directions for Bitcoin.
456 views00:31
Open / Comment
2021-05-24 02:45:38
Submitted This to the Core Team Everywhere Thanks for taking the time in advance to listen guys! This is in: 1. Their mailing list 2. IRC 3. GitHub 4. Reddit Some other areas where they might see it. If you see the Core team, tell them "No…
454 views23:45
Open / Comment
2021-05-24 01:36:53 Mastering Bitcoin Describes This Behavior Perfectly Here's the link: https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/mastering-bitcoin/9781491902639/ch05.html Specifically, it says: *"When a chain of transactions is transmitted across the network, they don't always…
468 views22:36
Open / Comment